Re: [PATCH v8 01/10] qspinlock: A generic 4-byte queue spinlock implementation

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 04/04/2014 09:00 AM, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
So I'm just not ever going to pick up this patch; I spend a week trying
to reverse engineer this; I posted a 7 patch series creating the
equivalent, but in a gradual and readable fashion:

   http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20140310154236.038181843@xxxxxxxxxxxxx

You keep on ignoring that; I'll keep on ignoring your patches.

I might at some point rewrite some of your pv stuff on top to get this
moving again, but I'm not really motivated to work with you atm.

Peter, I am sorry that I have focused recently on making the qspinlock patch works with virtualization and it is easier for me to based off on my patch initially. Now the PV part is almost done, I will apply them on top of your patch. Hopefully, I will get a new patch out sometime next week.

I am really sorry if you have bad feeling about it. I do not mean to discredit you on your effort to make the qspinlock patch better. I really appreciate your input and would like to work with you on this patch as well as other future patches.

-Longman
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe kvm" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html




[Index of Archives]     [KVM ARM]     [KVM ia64]     [KVM ppc]     [Virtualization Tools]     [Spice Development]     [Libvirt]     [Libvirt Users]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite Questions]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]     [XFree86]
  Powered by Linux