Il 26/03/2014 04:51, Paul Mackerras ha scritto:
> I would like to know from ARM and PPC maintainers *now* (before the
> merge window opens) what will be in 3.15. Also, PPC guys, please
> make sure the pull requests will be based on commit e724f080f5dd
> (KVM: PPC: Book3S HV: Fix register usage when loading/saving VRSAVE,
> 2014-03-13).
Alex has 5 commits in his kvm-ppc-queue branch that should go in.
That tree is based on your kvm-3.14-2 tag, not on e724f080f5dd.
Would you accept a pull request for that from me on Alex's behalf
since he's away?
Yes, of course.
Do you need me to rebase it at all?
These are:
1ac4484979 PPC: KVM: Introduce hypervisor call H_GET_TCE
e0a7be38c9 PPC: KVM: fix RESUME_GUEST check before returning from
kvmppc_run_core()
013e98e657 PPC: KVM: fix RESUME_GUEST check before ending CEDE in
kvmppc_run_core()
e8a7f11fe0 PPC: KVM: fix VCPU run for HV KVM (v2)
26d96ec97c PPC: KVM: introduce helper to check RESUME_GUEST and related
I would consider rebasing; but you know better than me the effect of the
two host-crash-fixing patches and how the testability/bisectability of
kvm-ppc-queue is affected.
In particular, how likely is it that reverse-bisection ("which commit
fixed the bug?") would end up on e724f080f5dd rather than one of the
four RESUME_GUEST commits?
There is also the set of 8 patches that I just posted and Scott
acked. I can make a branch based on e724f080f5dd and send you a pull
request.
Yes, thanks!
Paolo
Let me know what you would prefer regarding Alex's kvm-ppc-queue
branch.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe kvm" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
