On Mon, Jan 27, 2014 at 01:47:30PM +0100, Alexander Graf wrote: > > On 08.01.2014, at 11:25, Paul Mackerras <paulus@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > > + /* TM checkpointed state is now setup. All GPRs are now volatile. */ > > + TRECHKPT > > Where do we fault to if we get a transaction abort now? We can get one because we're not in suspended TM state, right? We're in non-transactional state before the trechkpt. instruction and in suspended state after it, so in neither case will a transaction abort cause a jump back to the tbegin. > > -<<<<<<< HEAD > > -======= > > Ah, so here you remove it again ;). Please run a bisectability test on the next patch set: Oops, sorry, yes I'll do that. Paul. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe kvm" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
