On 13/03/14 22:35, Peter Maydell wrote: > On 13 March 2014 21:28, Andreas Färber <afaerber@xxxxxxx> wrote: >> I'm not sure if we have a policy about __u64 etc. in KVM code. Since >> it'll be Linux-only I don't see problems currently; for cross-platform >> parts we prefer uint64_t. Suggest to leave as is unless told otherwise. > > For ARM I took the view that __u64 were the kernel's types, not > ours. The kernel header structs define fields as __u64 but for > in-QEMU functions and variables we should use the posix uint64_t. Thanks, I'll follow that way then. Cheers James -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe kvm" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
