On Mon, Mar 3, 2014 at 2:46 PM, Luis R. Rodriguez <mcgrof@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > From: "Luis R. Rodriguez" <mcgrof@xxxxxxxx> <-- snip --> > As I tested using the root block preference I noticed that if a net_device > slave under the bridge gets the designated root port prior to setting in > userspace the root_block feature enabling the feature won't kick the > bridge to remove that net_device from the designated port. I addressed > that issue and also upkeeping the initial random MAC address given to > the bridge as if othwerwise we'd end up with a zero MAC address bridge > if we root block all ports. I have only done local tests I'd appreciate a > bit more wide test coverage and review. Stephen, I should note that even if we discard patches 4-6 patches for an alternative implementation patches 1-3 should still be applicable for review. Let me know what you think of those. Luis -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe kvm" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
