Re: [RFC]VM live snapshot proposal

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Il 03/03/2014 13:55, Kevin Wolf ha scritto:
> > Due to memory-modifications may happen in kvm, qemu, or vhost, the key-part is how we
> > can provide common page-modify-tracking-and-saving api, we completed a prototype by
> > simply add modified-page tracking/saving function in qemu, and it seems worked fine.
>
> Yes, this is the tricky part.  To be honest, I think this is the reason
> no one has submitted patches - it's a hard task and the win isn't that
> great (you can already migrate to file).
So why don't we simply reuse the existing migration code?

I think this is different in the same way that block-backup and block-mirror are different. Huangpeng's proposal would let you make a consistent snapshot of disks and RAM.

Paolo
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe kvm" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html




[Index of Archives]     [KVM ARM]     [KVM ia64]     [KVM ppc]     [Virtualization Tools]     [Spice Development]     [Libvirt]     [Libvirt Users]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite Questions]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]     [XFree86]
  Powered by Linux