On Wed, Feb 26, 2014 at 8:44 PM, Christian Borntraeger <borntraeger@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > From: Michael Mueller <mimu@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> > > Use the arch specific function kvm_arch_vcpu_runnable() to add a further > criterium to identify a suitable vcpu to yield to during undirected yield > processing. > > Signed-off-by: Michael Mueller <mimu@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> > Reviewed-by: Christian Borntraeger <borntraeger@xxxxxxxxxx> > Signed-off-by: Christian Borntraeger <borntraeger@xxxxxxxxxx> > --- > virt/kvm/kvm_main.c | 2 +- > 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) > > diff --git a/virt/kvm/kvm_main.c b/virt/kvm/kvm_main.c > index f5668a4..5fd4cf8 100644 > --- a/virt/kvm/kvm_main.c > +++ b/virt/kvm/kvm_main.c > @@ -1801,7 +1801,7 @@ void kvm_vcpu_on_spin(struct kvm_vcpu *me) > continue; > if (vcpu == me) > continue; > - if (waitqueue_active(&vcpu->wq)) > + if (waitqueue_active(&vcpu->wq) && !kvm_arch_vcpu_runnable(vcpu)) > continue; > if (!kvm_vcpu_eligible_for_directed_yield(vcpu)) > continue; > -- > 1.8.4.2 > I ran kernbench/sysbench/ebizzy on x86 guest to confirm that this did not have any adverse effect in ple handler path. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe kvm" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
