On Wed, 26 Feb 2014 09:29:12 +0100 Christian Borntraeger <borntraeger@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > On 25/02/14 18:25, Cornelia Huck wrote: > > > +int kvm_s390_io_adapter_map(uint32_t id, uint64_t map_addr, bool do_map) > > +{ > > + struct kvm_s390_io_adapter_req req = { > > + .id = id, > > + .type = do_map ? KVM_S390_IO_ADAPTER_MAP : KVM_S390_IO_ADAPTER_UNMAP, > > + .addr = map_addr, > > + }; > > + KVMS390FLICState *flic = s390_get_flic(); > > + struct kvm_device_attr attr; > > Can we use designated initializer for attr, e.g. > struct kvm_device_attr attr = { > .group = KVM_DEV_FLIC_ADAPTER_MODIFY, > .addr = (uint64_t)&req, > } > > > + int r; > > + > > + if (!flic) { > > + return -ENOSYS; > > + } > > + if (!kvm_check_extension(kvm_state, KVM_CAP_IRQ_ROUTING)) { > > + return -ENOSYS; > > + } > > + > > + attr.group = KVM_DEV_FLIC_ADAPTER_MODIFY; > > + attr.addr = (uint64_t)&req; > > and not do it here. That will zero out the other fields of attr. > > Same for the register code. > Hm, yes, I missed that. I'll change it for the next version. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe kvm" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html