On Tue, Feb 25, 2014 at 02:01:59AM +0000, Ben Hutchings wrote: > On Mon, 2014-02-24 at 19:12 -0500, David Miller wrote: > > From: Ben Hutchings <ben@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> > > Date: Tue, 25 Feb 2014 00:02:00 +0000 > > > > > You can run an internal network, or access network, as v6-only with > > > NAT64 and DNS64 at the border. I believe some mobile networks are doing > > > this; it was also done on the main FOSDEM wireless network this year. > > > > This seems to be bloating up the networking headers of the internal > > network, for what purpose? > > > > For mobile that's doubly inadvisable. > > I don't know what the reasoning is for the mobile network operators. > They're forced to do NAT for v4 somewhere, and maybe v6-only makes the > access network easier to manage. Yes, it seems the way to go: <http://www.dslreports.com/shownews/TMobile-Goes-IPv6-Only-on-Android-44-Devices-126506> I can't comment on the 464xlat that much because I haven't looked at an implementation yet, but it can very well be the case it still needs IPv4 on the outgoing interface, I don't know (from the spec pov it doesn't look like that). Greetings, Hannes -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe kvm" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
