On Mon, Feb 24, 2014 at 10:22 AM, Dan Williams <dcbw@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > My use-case would simply be to have an analogue for the disable_ipv6 > case. In the future I expect more people will want to disable IPv4 as > they move to IPv6. If you don't have something like disable_ipv4, then > there's no way to ensure that some random program or something doesn't > set up IPv4 stuff that you don't want. > > Same thing for IPv6; some people really don't want IPv6 enabled on an > interface no matter what; they don't want an IPv6LL address assigned, > they don't want kernel SLAAC, they want to ensure that *nothing* > IPv6-related gets done for that interface. The same can be true for > IPv4, but we don't have a way of doing that right now. I'll add this to my queue. Luis -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe kvm" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
