Heiko Carstens wrote:
On Thu, 22 Jan 2009 12:26:11 +0100
Carsten Otte <cotte@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
Am Thu, 22 Jan 2009 12:17:07 +0100
schrieb heicars2@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx:
Why don't you just remove the printk? IMHO it's rather pointless.
It is'nt: It infoms the user why his guest is going to crash
even though it has performed an operation that is perfectly
legal according to the spec.
If you have hundreds of guests running, how do you get the connection
from this message to a specific user process?
Informing a user process that it did something that isn't allowed or
supported is usually done by returning an appropriate return code.
Right, either inject an exception to the guest (if appropriate for the
arch), or return -ESOMETHING from ioctl(KVM_RUN).
--
error compiling committee.c: too many arguments to function
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe kvm" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
