On Mon Apr 8, 2024 at 3:20 PM AEST, Michael Ellerman wrote: > Thorsten Leemhuis <regressions@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> writes: > > On 05.04.24 05:20, Michael Ellerman wrote: > >> "Linux regression tracking (Thorsten Leemhuis)" > >> <regressions@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> writes: > >>> Hi, Thorsten here, the Linux kernel's regression tracker. Top-posting > >>> for once, to make this easily accessible to everyone. > >>> > >>> Was this regression ever resolved? Doesn't look like it, but maybe I > >>> just missed something. > >> > >> I'm not sure how it ended up on the regression list. > > > > That is easy to explain: I let lei search for mails containing words > > like regress, bisect, and revert to become aware of regressions that > > might need tracking. And... > > > >> IMHO it's not really a regression. > > > > ...sometimes I misjudge or misinterpret something and add it to the > > regression tracking. Looks like that happened here. > > > > Sorry for that and the noise it caused! > > No worries. It is actually a regression. It only really affects performance, but the logic is broken (my fault). We were going to revert it, and solve the initial regression a better way. Thanks, Nick
