Le 20/05/2020 à 19:32, Greg Kurz a écrit :
On Wed, 20 May 2020 18:51:10 +0200
Laurent Dufour <ldufour@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
The commit 8c47b6ff29e3 ("KVM: PPC: Book3S HV: Check caller of H_SVM_*
Hcalls") added checks of secure bit of SRR1 to filter out the Hcall
reserved to the Ultravisor.
However, the Hcall H_SVM_INIT_ABORT is made by the Ultravisor passing the
context of the VM calling UV_ESM. This allows the Hypervisor to return to
the guest without going through the Ultravisor. Thus the Secure bit of SRR1
is not set in that particular case.
In the case a regular VM is calling H_SVM_INIT_ABORT, this hcall will be
filtered out in kvmppc_h_svm_init_abort() because kvm->arch.secure_guest is
not set in that case.
Why not checking vcpu->kvm->arch.secure_guest then ?
I don't think that's the right place.
Fixes: 8c47b6ff29e3 ("KVM: PPC: Book3S HV: Check caller of H_SVM_* Hcalls")
Signed-off-by: Laurent Dufour <ldufour@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
---
arch/powerpc/kvm/book3s_hv.c | 4 +---
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 3 deletions(-)
diff --git a/arch/powerpc/kvm/book3s_hv.c b/arch/powerpc/kvm/book3s_hv.c
index 93493f0cbfe8..eb1f96cb7b72 100644
--- a/arch/powerpc/kvm/book3s_hv.c
+++ b/arch/powerpc/kvm/book3s_hv.c
@@ -1099,9 +1099,7 @@ int kvmppc_pseries_do_hcall(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
ret = kvmppc_h_svm_init_done(vcpu->kvm);
break;
case H_SVM_INIT_ABORT:
- ret = H_UNSUPPORTED;
- if (kvmppc_get_srr1(vcpu) & MSR_S)
- ret = kvmppc_h_svm_init_abort(vcpu->kvm);
or at least put a comment to explain why H_SVM_INIT_ABORT
doesn't have the same sanity check as the other SVM hcalls.
I agree that might help. I'll send a v2 with a comment there.
+ ret = kvmppc_h_svm_init_abort(vcpu->kvm);
break;
default:
