On Tue, Aug 20, 2019 at 12:04:33AM -0300, Thiago Jung Bauermann wrote:
>
> Hello Bharata,
>
> I have just a couple of small comments.
>
> Bharata B Rao <bharata@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> writes:
>
> > +/*
> > + * Get a free device PFN from the pool
> > + *
> > + * Called when a normal page is moved to secure memory (UV_PAGE_IN). Device
> > + * PFN will be used to keep track of the secure page on HV side.
> > + *
> > + * @rmap here is the slot in the rmap array that corresponds to @gpa.
> > + * Thus a non-zero rmap entry indicates that the corresonding guest
>
> Typo: corresponding
>
> > +static u64 kvmppc_get_secmem_size(void)
> > +{
> > + struct device_node *np;
> > + int i, len;
> > + const __be32 *prop;
> > + u64 size = 0;
> > +
> > + np = of_find_node_by_path("/ibm,ultravisor/ibm,uv-firmware");
> > + if (!np)
> > + goto out;
>
> I believe that in general we try to avoid hard-coding the path when a
> node is accessed and searched instead via its compatible property.
Thanks, will switch to of_find_compatible_node().
Regards,
Bharata.
