On Thu, Jan 11, 2018 at 06:11:30PM +0800, wei.guo.simon@xxxxxxxxx wrote: > ines: 219 > > From: Simon Guo <wei.guo.simon@xxxxxxxxx> > > The math registers will be saved into vcpu->arch.fp/vr and corresponding > vcpu->arch.fp_tm/vr_tm area. > > We flush or giveup the math regs into vcpu->arch.fp/vr before saving > transaction. After transaction is restored, the math regs will be loaded > back into regs. It looks to me that you are loading up the math regs on every vcpu load, not just those with an active transaction. That seems like overkill. > If there is a FP/VEC/VSX unavailable exception during transaction active > state, the math checkpoint content might be incorrect and we need to do > treclaim./load the correct checkpoint val/trechkpt. sequence to retry the > transaction. I would prefer a simpler approach where just before entering the guest, we check if the guest MSR TM bit is set, and if so we make sure that whichever math regs are enabled in the guest MSR are actually loaded on the CPU, that is, that guest_owned_ext has the same bits set as the guest MSR. Then we never have to handle a FP/VEC/VSX unavailable interrupt with a transaction active (other than by simply passing it on to the guest). Paul. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe kvm-ppc" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
