On 04.04.2017 08:25, Paul Mackerras wrote: > On Mon, Apr 03, 2017 at 01:23:15PM +0200, Thomas Huth wrote: >> According to the PowerISA 2.07, mtspr and mfspr should not generate >> an illegal instruction exception when being used with an undefined SPR, >> but rather treat the instruction as a NOP, inject a privilege exception >> or an emulation assistance exception - depending on the SPR number. > > The emulation assist interrupt is a hypervisor interrupt, so the guest > would not be expecting to receive it. On a real machine, the > hypervisor would synthesize an illegal instruction type program > interrupt as described in the last programming note in section 6.5.9 > of Book III of Power ISA v2.07B. Since we are the hypervisor here, we > should synthesize a program interrupt rather than an emulation assist > interrupt. Ah, right, we're doing this in other spots, too, so a PROGILL is indeed more consistent here. I'll send a v2 ... Thomas -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe kvm-ppc" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
