On 09/30/2015 01:32 PM, Laurentiu Tudor wrote:
> On 09/25/2015 03:10 AM, Scott Wood wrote:
>> On Thu, 2015-09-24 at 16:11 +0300, Laurentiu Tudor wrote:
[snip]
>>> diff --git a/arch/powerpc/kvm/e500_mmu_host.c
>>> b/arch/powerpc/kvm/e500_mmu_host.c
>>> index 12d5c67..99ad88a 100644
>>> --- a/arch/powerpc/kvm/e500_mmu_host.c
>>> +++ b/arch/powerpc/kvm/e500_mmu_host.c
>>> @@ -96,6 +96,112 @@ static inline void __write_host_tlbe(struct
>>> kvm_book3e_206_tlb_entry *stlbe,
>>> stlbe->mas2, stlbe->mas7_3);
>>> }
>>>
>>> +#if defined(CONFIG_64BIT) && defined(CONFIG_KVM_BOOKE_HV)
>>> +static int lrat_next(void)
>>> +{
>>
>> Will anything break by removing the CONFIG_64BIT condition, even if we don't
>> have a 32-bit target that uses this?
>
> Not completly certain but i remember getting compile or link errors
> on 32-bit e500mc or e500v2. I can recheck if you want.
>
I double-checked this and indeed it doesn't compile on 32-bit because
lrat_next() calls get_paca().
---
Best Regards, Laurentiu
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe kvm-ppc" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
