Is There specific any reason not to copy extra handler IOVR 35 for e500?
--- a/arch/powerpc/kvm/e500.c
+++ b/arch/powerpc/kvm/e500.c
@@ -527,7 +527,7 @@ static struct kvmppc_ops kvm_ops_e500 = {
static int __init kvmppc_e500_init(void)
{
int r, i;
- unsigned long ivor[3];
+ unsigned long ivor[4];
/* Process remaining handlers above the generic first 16 */
unsigned long *handler = &kvmppc_booke_handler_addr[16];
unsigned long handler_len;
@@ -545,7 +545,8 @@ static int __init kvmppc_e500_init(void)
ivor[0] = mfspr(SPRN_IVOR32);
ivor[1] = mfspr(SPRN_IVOR33);
ivor[2] = mfspr(SPRN_IVOR34);
- for (i = 0; i < 3; i++) {
+ ivor[3] = mfspr(SPRN_IVOR35);
+ for (i = 0; i < 4; i++) {
if (ivor[i] > ivor[max_ivor])
max_ivor = i;
Please ignore this patch if find it irrelevant or been submitted.
Thanks,
Amit Tomar.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe kvm-ppc" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
