On 27.09.2013, at 12:03, Aneesh Kumar K.V wrote:
> From: "Aneesh Kumar K.V" <aneesh.kumar@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
>
> This patch moves PR related tracepoints to a separate header. This
> enables in converting PR to a kernel module which will be done in
> later patches
>
> Signed-off-by: Aneesh Kumar K.V <aneesh.kumar@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> ---
> arch/powerpc/kvm/book3s_64_mmu_host.c | 2 +-
> arch/powerpc/kvm/book3s_mmu_hpte.c | 2 +-
> arch/powerpc/kvm/book3s_pr.c | 3 +-
> arch/powerpc/kvm/trace.h | 234 +--------------------------
> arch/powerpc/kvm/trace_pr.h | 297 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> 5 files changed, 308 insertions(+), 230 deletions(-)
> create mode 100644 arch/powerpc/kvm/trace_pr.h
>
> diff --git a/arch/powerpc/kvm/book3s_64_mmu_host.c b/arch/powerpc/kvm/book3s_64_mmu_host.c
> index 329a978..fd5b393 100644
> --- a/arch/powerpc/kvm/book3s_64_mmu_host.c
> +++ b/arch/powerpc/kvm/book3s_64_mmu_host.c
> @@ -27,7 +27,7 @@
> #include <asm/machdep.h>
> #include <asm/mmu_context.h>
> #include <asm/hw_irq.h>
> -#include "trace.h"
> +#include "trace_pr.h"
>
> #define PTE_SIZE 12
>
> diff --git a/arch/powerpc/kvm/book3s_mmu_hpte.c b/arch/powerpc/kvm/book3s_mmu_hpte.c
> index d2d280b..4556168 100644
> --- a/arch/powerpc/kvm/book3s_mmu_hpte.c
> +++ b/arch/powerpc/kvm/book3s_mmu_hpte.c
> @@ -28,7 +28,7 @@
> #include <asm/mmu_context.h>
> #include <asm/hw_irq.h>
>
> -#include "trace.h"
> +#include "trace_pr.h"
>
> #define PTE_SIZE 12
>
> diff --git a/arch/powerpc/kvm/book3s_pr.c b/arch/powerpc/kvm/book3s_pr.c
> index 2a97279..99d0839 100644
> --- a/arch/powerpc/kvm/book3s_pr.c
> +++ b/arch/powerpc/kvm/book3s_pr.c
> @@ -41,7 +41,8 @@
> #include <linux/vmalloc.h>
> #include <linux/highmem.h>
>
> -#include "trace.h"
> +#define CREATE_TRACE_POINTS
> +#include "trace_pr.h"
>
> /* #define EXIT_DEBUG */
> /* #define DEBUG_EXT */
> diff --git a/arch/powerpc/kvm/trace.h b/arch/powerpc/kvm/trace.h
> index a088e9a..7d5a136 100644
> --- a/arch/powerpc/kvm/trace.h
> +++ b/arch/powerpc/kvm/trace.h
> @@ -85,6 +85,12 @@ TRACE_EVENT(kvm_ppc_instr,
> {41, "HV_PRIV"}
> #endif
>
> +#ifndef CONFIG_KVM_BOOK3S_PR
> +/*
> + * For pr we define this in trace_pr.h since it pr can be built as
> + * a module
Not sure I understand the need. If the config option is available, so should the struct field. Worst case that happens with HV is that we get empty shadow_srr1 values in our trace, no?
If your goal is to make it more obvious whether we are tracing in PR or HV land (which is a reasonable goal), then you should also split off all non-common trace points into a special hv trace header so that it's obvious whether we are looking at HV or PR.
Alex
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe kvm-ppc" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
