Christian Ehrhardt wrote:
Hollis and I discussed how to continue on that.
Atm the upstream code is broken for powerpc and your response is too
vague for me to extend our patch in some way.
So which way should we go? Will you apply (or should I resubmit ?)
Hollis patch for now to fix upstream for powerpc. And we/you extend it
later or what else would you prefer?
My thinking is that we convert CONFIG_* to __i386__, __x86_64__,
__powerpc__, and the like, using the hack-modules pass in 'make sync'.
The advantages of that are:
- 'make sync' headers are architecture independent. Currently once you
run 'make sync', the headers become tied to the arch, even the ones in
include/linux
- The headers are standalone -- no need for -DCONFIG_* in anything that
includes it
- We already mangle things, so it's not a big change
I think Xiantao was going to try it, but if not, then please do it
yourself. I could too, of course, but I prefer someone that can test on
non-x86 do it.
--
error compiling committee.c: too many arguments to function
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe kvm-ppc" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
