On Tue, Aug 30, 2011 at 09:43:19AM -0500, Ryan Harper wrote: > * Marcelo Tosatti <mtosatti@xxxxxxxxxx> [2011-08-30 09:40]: > > On Tue, Aug 30, 2011 at 09:12:17AM -0500, Ryan Harper wrote: > > > * Marcelo Tosatti <mtosatti@xxxxxxxxxx> [2011-08-30 07:35]: > > > > On Mon, Aug 29, 2011 at 05:27:11PM -0600, Eric B Munson wrote: > > > > > Currently, when qemu stops a guest kernel that guest will issue a soft lockup > > > > > message when it resumes. This set provides the ability for qemu to comminucate > > > > > to the guest that it has been stopped. When the guest hits the watchdog on > > > > > resume it will check if it was suspended before issuing the warning. > > > > > > > > > > Eric B Munson (4): > > > > > Add flag to indicate that a vm was stopped by the host > > > > > Add functions to check if the host has stopped the vm > > > > > Add generic stubs for kvm stop check functions > > > > > Add check for suspended vm in softlockup detector > > > > > > > > > > arch/x86/include/asm/pvclock-abi.h | 1 + > > > > > arch/x86/include/asm/pvclock.h | 2 ++ > > > > > arch/x86/kernel/kvmclock.c | 14 ++++++++++++++ > > > > > include/asm-generic/pvclock.h | 14 ++++++++++++++ > > > > > kernel/watchdog.c | 12 ++++++++++++ > > > > > 5 files changed, 43 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-) > > > > > create mode 100644 include/asm-generic/pvclock.h > > > > > > > > > > -- > > > > > 1.7.4.1 > > > > > > > > How is the host supposed to set this flag? > > > > > > > > As mentioned previously, if you save save/restore the offset added to > > > > kvmclock on stop/cont (and the TSC MSR, forgot to mention that), no > > > > paravirt infrastructure is required. Which means the issue is also fixed > > > > for older guests. > > > > > > How is saving the offset going to prevent a large jump from triggering > > > the softlock message? Won't we still have not touched the watchdog for > > > that long period of time? > > > > The idea is to adjust the offset and the TSC value so that the guest > > does not notice the actual elapsed time. This is what happens when a > > guest is migrated or saved/restore, for example. > > but that's within a rather short period of time... if we stop the guest > for a day, I don't think what you are suggesting can happen without time > being wrong in the guest, Right. > and as soon as it's corrected and we jump forward larger than the > watchdog timeout, won't we trigger it again? The time correction within the guest happens separately from the kvmclock clocksource, so no, watchdog timeout will not trigger. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe kvm-ia64" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
