On 11/10/2010 11:30 AM, Jan Kiszka wrote:
Am 10.11.2010 10:17, Avi Kivity wrote: > On 11/09/2010 11:01 PM, Alexander Graf wrote: >> On 09.11.2010, at 17:02, Jan Kiszka wrote: >> >>> IA64 support forces us to abstract the allocation of the kvm structure. >>> But instead of mixing this up with arch-specific initialization and >>> doing the same on destruction, split both steps. This allows to move >>> generic destruction calls into generic code. >>> >>> It also fixes error clean-up on failures of kvm_create_vm for IA64. >>> >>> Signed-off-by: Jan Kiszka<jan.kiszka@xxxxxxxxxxx> >>> --- >>> >>> Changes in v2: >>> - Fixed s390 conversion and added linux/slab.h >>> as remarked by Christian (thanks!) >>> >>> arch/ia64/include/asm/kvm_host.h | 4 ++++ >>> arch/ia64/kvm/kvm-ia64.c | 28 +++++++--------------------- >>> arch/powerpc/kvm/powerpc.c | 20 +++----------------- >>> arch/s390/kvm/kvm-s390.c | 23 ++++++----------------- >>> arch/x86/kvm/x86.c | 12 ++---------- >>> include/linux/kvm_host.h | 15 ++++++++++++++- >>> virt/kvm/kvm_main.c | 19 +++++++++++++------ >>> 7 files changed, 49 insertions(+), 72 deletions(-) >>> >>> diff --git a/arch/ia64/include/asm/kvm_host.h b/arch/ia64/include/asm/kvm_host.h >>> index 2f229e5..2689ee5 100644 >>> --- a/arch/ia64/include/asm/kvm_host.h >>> +++ b/arch/ia64/include/asm/kvm_host.h >>> @@ -590,6 +590,10 @@ int kvm_emulate_halt(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu); >>> int kvm_pal_emul(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, struct kvm_run *kvm_run); >>> void kvm_sal_emul(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu); >>> >>> +#define __KVM_HAVE_ARCH_VM_ALLOC 1 >>> +struct kvm *kvm_arch_alloc_vm(void); >>> +void kvm_arch_free_vm(struct kvm *kvm); >>> + >>> #endif /* __ASSEMBLY__*/ >>> >>> #endif >>> diff --git a/arch/ia64/kvm/kvm-ia64.c b/arch/ia64/kvm/kvm-ia64.c >>> index f56a631..48a48bd 100644 >>> --- a/arch/ia64/kvm/kvm-ia64.c >>> +++ b/arch/ia64/kvm/kvm-ia64.c >>> @@ -749,7 +749,7 @@ out: >>> return r; >>> } >>> >>> -static struct kvm *kvm_alloc_kvm(void) >>> +struct kvm *kvm_arch_alloc_vm(void) >>> { >>> >>> struct kvm *kvm; >>> @@ -760,7 +760,7 @@ static struct kvm *kvm_alloc_kvm(void) >>> vm_base = __get_free_pages(GFP_KERNEL, get_order(KVM_VM_DATA_SIZE)); >>> >>> if (!vm_base) >>> - return ERR_PTR(-ENOMEM); >>> + return NULL; >>> >>> memset((void *)vm_base, 0, KVM_VM_DATA_SIZE); >>> kvm = (struct kvm *)(vm_base + >>> @@ -806,10 +806,12 @@ static void kvm_build_io_pmt(struct kvm *kvm) >>> #define GUEST_PHYSICAL_RR4 0x2739 >>> #define VMM_INIT_RR 0x1660 >>> >>> -static void kvm_init_vm(struct kvm *kvm) >>> +int kvm_arch_init_vm(struct kvm *kvm) >>> { >>> BUG_ON(!kvm); >>> >>> + kvm->arch.is_sn2 = ia64_platform_is("sn2"); >>> + >>> kvm->arch.metaphysical_rr0 = GUEST_PHYSICAL_RR0; >>> kvm->arch.metaphysical_rr4 = GUEST_PHYSICAL_RR4; >>> kvm->arch.vmm_init_rr = VMM_INIT_RR; >>> @@ -823,21 +825,8 @@ static void kvm_init_vm(struct kvm *kvm) >>> >>> /* Reserve bit 0 of irq_sources_bitmap for userspace irq source */ >>> set_bit(KVM_USERSPACE_IRQ_SOURCE_ID,&kvm->arch.irq_sources_bitmap); >>> -} >>> - >>> -struct kvm *kvm_arch_create_vm(void) >>> -{ >>> - struct kvm *kvm = kvm_alloc_kvm(); >>> - >>> - if (IS_ERR(kvm)) >>> - return ERR_PTR(-ENOMEM); >>> - >>> - kvm->arch.is_sn2 = ia64_platform_is("sn2"); >>> - >>> - kvm_init_vm(kvm); >>> - >>> - return kvm; >>> >>> + return 0; >>> } >>> >>> static int kvm_vm_ioctl_get_irqchip(struct kvm *kvm, >>> @@ -1357,7 +1346,7 @@ int kvm_arch_vcpu_ioctl_set_guest_debug(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, >>> return -EINVAL; >>> } >>> >>> -static void free_kvm(struct kvm *kvm) >>> +void kvm_arch_free_vm(struct kvm *kvm) >>> { >>> unsigned long vm_base = kvm->arch.vm_base; >>> >>> @@ -1399,9 +1388,6 @@ void kvm_arch_destroy_vm(struct kvm *kvm) >>> #endif >>> kfree(kvm->arch.vioapic); >>> kvm_release_vm_pages(kvm); >>> - kvm_free_physmem(kvm); >>> - cleanup_srcu_struct(&kvm->srcu); >>> - free_kvm(kvm); >>> } >>> >>> void kvm_arch_vcpu_put(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu) >>> diff --git a/arch/powerpc/kvm/powerpc.c b/arch/powerpc/kvm/powerpc.c >>> index 38f756f..ce3dd65 100644 >>> --- a/arch/powerpc/kvm/powerpc.c >>> +++ b/arch/powerpc/kvm/powerpc.c >>> @@ -145,18 +145,12 @@ void kvm_arch_check_processor_compat(void *rtn) >>> *(int *)rtn = kvmppc_core_check_processor_compat(); >>> } >>> >>> -struct kvm *kvm_arch_create_vm(void) >>> +int kvm_arch_init_vm(struct kvm *) >> >> Eh, no. This doesn't compile :). > > What's the problem? lack of a formal argument? The unnamed argument is referenced as 'kvm' in this function.
It isn't referenced:
int kvm_arch_init_vm(struct kvm *) { return 0; }
Will you fix this up on merge or should I resend?
I'll fix it, as soon as I understand it. -- error compiling committee.c: too many arguments to function -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe kvm-ia64" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html