Re: [patch] fix kvm_arch_vcpu_ioctl_[gs]et_regs()

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Avi Kivity wrote:
This makes several tons of sense, but breaks backwards compatibility. If I understand correctly, get/set was never used so this shouldn't matter?

I suggest reserving some space at the end of kvm_regs in case further state needs to be added.

The code never worked, so it's not an issue to break backwards compat, but I agree. I'll add some space for future extensions.

Cheers,
Jes
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe kvm-ia64" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

[Index of Archives]     [Linux KVM Devel]     [Linux Virtualization]     [Big List of Linux Books]     [Linux SCSI]     [Yosemite Forum]

  Powered by Linux