Amit Shah wrote:
> * On Friday 03 Oct 2008 13:02:05 Zhang, Xiantao wrote:
>> Amit Shah wrote:
>>> * On Monday 29 Sep 2008 10:56:29 Zhang, Xiantao wrote:
>>>> From: Xiantao Zhang <xiantao.zhang@xxxxxxxxx>
>>>> Date: Sat, 27 Sep 2008 10:59:36 +0800
>>>> Subject: [PATCH] kvm: Moving device_assignment logic to kvm_main.c
>>>>
>>>> To share with other archs, this patch moves device_assignment
>>>> logic to common parts. Signed-off-by: Xiantao Zhang
>>>> <xiantao.zhang@xxxxxxxxx>
>>>>
>>>> diff --git a/include/linux/kvm.h b/include/linux/kvm.h
>>>> index 4269be1..9acf34a 100644
>>>> --- a/include/linux/kvm.h
>>>> +++ b/include/linux/kvm.h
>>>> @@ -383,7 +383,9 @@ struct kvm_trace_rec {
>>>> #define KVM_CAP_MP_STATE 14
>>>> #define KVM_CAP_COALESCED_MMIO 15
>>>> #define KVM_CAP_SYNC_MMU 16 /* Changes to host mmap are reflected
>>>> in guest */ +#ifdef CONFIG_X86
>>>> #define KVM_CAP_DEVICE_ASSIGNMENT 17
>>>> +#endif
>>>
>>> I didn't see this changed to also accomodate IA64 in the patchset.
>>
>> Since linux-ia64 DMAR is not ready in kvm.git, and it should be in
>> linux-ia64.git. So it should be in kvm.git once Avi merged with
> OK; Does Linus' tree currently have the necessary support?
If Linus's tree has picked up it from linux-ia64, it should be ready.
> Also, I think you'll have to redo the patch 1/8 after Weidong's mmio
> patch got merged.
Yes, if weidong's patch merged first, the patch should be regenerated
:)
>> upstream, so I didn't enable it for kvm/ia64 now. You know, S390
>> has no pci support, so if we put the code in kvm_mainc, we should
>> use the macro to exclude other arch which doesn't need device
>> assignments. If DMAR is ready for kvm.git, I will change this macro
>> as following: #if defined(CONFIG_X86) || defined(CONFIG_IA64)
>> #define KVM_CAP_DEVICE_ASSIGNMENT 17
>> #endif
>
> Yes, that's what I meant.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe kvm-ia64" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
