Avi Kivity wrote: > Zhang, Xiantao wrote: >>> >>> I agree that for automatic testing it's more of a burden; but it >>> needs to be done, especially as some kvm features are only enabled >>> on newer kernels. >>> >>> The external module is convenient, but it's not a substitute for >>> the real thing. >>> >> >> So, I have a question here, When will you drop external module >> support? >> > > I don't really know. > >> You know, it blocks our auto-testing system now, we have to >> re-evaulate the effort without external module support. >> > > I think it's very worthwhile to update the autotester to be able to > build kernels. kvm will soon depend on core functionality (mmu > notifiers) and since currently kvm is the only user (well, gru will be > added soon, but ...) we need to test it ourselves. > >> If it won't be dropped in a few weeks, we are eager to get its >> support for kvm-ia64. >> >> > > Okay, please send the patches, but with diff -M so they're readable. OK, I will regenerate the patches. Thanks! Xiantao -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe kvm-ia64" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
