Re: ld2.acq - sign extension?

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Andreas Schwab wrote:
Jes Sorensen <jes@xxxxxxx> writes:

Basically if I apply the below diff my code no longer works. However I
am under the impression that ld2.acq does sign extension?

ld always zero extends.

Hi Andreas,

Thats what I thought too, but do you have any explanation as to why
that patch I included makes a difference?

Thanks,
Jes
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe kvm-ia64" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

[Index of Archives]     [Linux KVM Devel]     [Linux Virtualization]     [Big List of Linux Books]     [Linux SCSI]     [Yosemite Forum]

  Powered by Linux