From: Takuya Yoshikawa <yoshikawa.takuya@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> The naming convension of hardware_[dis|en]able family is little bit confusing because only hardware_[dis|en]able_all are using _nolock suffix. Renaming current hardware_[dis|en]able() to *_nolock() and using hardware_[dis|en]able() as wrapper functions which take kvm_lock for them reduces extra confusion. Signed-off-by: Takuya Yoshikawa <yoshikawa.takuya@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> Signed-off-by: Marcelo Tosatti <mtosatti@xxxxxxxxxx> diff --git a/virt/kvm/kvm_main.c b/virt/kvm/kvm_main.c index 0fdd911..fb93ff9 100644 --- a/virt/kvm/kvm_main.c +++ b/virt/kvm/kvm_main.c @@ -2067,7 +2067,7 @@ static struct miscdevice kvm_dev = { &kvm_chardev_ops, }; -static void hardware_enable(void *junk) +static void hardware_enable_nolock(void *junk) { int cpu = raw_smp_processor_id(); int r; @@ -2087,7 +2087,14 @@ static void hardware_enable(void *junk) } } -static void hardware_disable(void *junk) +static void hardware_enable(void *junk) +{ + spin_lock(&kvm_lock); + hardware_enable_nolock(junk); + spin_unlock(&kvm_lock); +} + +static void hardware_disable_nolock(void *junk) { int cpu = raw_smp_processor_id(); @@ -2097,13 +2104,20 @@ static void hardware_disable(void *junk) kvm_arch_hardware_disable(NULL); } +static void hardware_disable(void *junk) +{ + spin_lock(&kvm_lock); + hardware_disable_nolock(junk); + spin_unlock(&kvm_lock); +} + static void hardware_disable_all_nolock(void) { BUG_ON(!kvm_usage_count); kvm_usage_count--; if (!kvm_usage_count) - on_each_cpu(hardware_disable, NULL, 1); + on_each_cpu(hardware_disable_nolock, NULL, 1); } static void hardware_disable_all(void) @@ -2122,7 +2136,7 @@ static int hardware_enable_all(void) kvm_usage_count++; if (kvm_usage_count == 1) { atomic_set(&hardware_enable_failed, 0); - on_each_cpu(hardware_enable, NULL, 1); + on_each_cpu(hardware_enable_nolock, NULL, 1); if (atomic_read(&hardware_enable_failed)) { hardware_disable_all_nolock(); @@ -2148,16 +2162,12 @@ static int kvm_cpu_hotplug(struct notifier_block *notifier, unsigned long val, case CPU_DYING: printk(KERN_INFO "kvm: disabling virtualization on CPU%d\n", cpu); - spin_lock(&kvm_lock); hardware_disable(NULL); - spin_unlock(&kvm_lock); break; case CPU_STARTING: printk(KERN_INFO "kvm: enabling virtualization on CPU%d\n", cpu); - spin_lock(&kvm_lock); hardware_enable(NULL); - spin_unlock(&kvm_lock); break; } return NOTIFY_OK; @@ -2188,7 +2198,7 @@ static int kvm_reboot(struct notifier_block *notifier, unsigned long val, */ printk(KERN_INFO "kvm: exiting hardware virtualization\n"); kvm_rebooting = true; - on_each_cpu(hardware_disable, NULL, 1); + on_each_cpu(hardware_disable_nolock, NULL, 1); return NOTIFY_OK; } @@ -2358,7 +2368,7 @@ static void kvm_exit_debug(void) static int kvm_suspend(struct sys_device *dev, pm_message_t state) { if (kvm_usage_count) - hardware_disable(NULL); + hardware_disable_nolock(NULL); return 0; } @@ -2366,7 +2376,7 @@ static int kvm_resume(struct sys_device *dev) { if (kvm_usage_count) { WARN_ON(spin_is_locked(&kvm_lock)); - hardware_enable(NULL); + hardware_enable_nolock(NULL); } return 0; } @@ -2543,7 +2553,7 @@ void kvm_exit(void) sysdev_class_unregister(&kvm_sysdev_class); unregister_reboot_notifier(&kvm_reboot_notifier); unregister_cpu_notifier(&kvm_cpu_notifier); - on_each_cpu(hardware_disable, NULL, 1); + on_each_cpu(hardware_disable_nolock, NULL, 1); kvm_arch_hardware_unsetup(); kvm_arch_exit(); free_cpumask_var(cpus_hardware_enabled); -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe kvm-commits" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html