Hi Marc, On Sun, Nov 13, 2022 at 8:46 AM Marc Zyngier <maz@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > PMUv3p5 (which is mandatory with ARMv8.5) comes with some extra > features: > > - All counters are 64bit > > - The overflow point is controlled by the PMCR_EL0.LP bit > > Add the required checks in the helpers that control counter > width and overflow, as well as the sysreg handling for the LP > bit. A new kvm_pmu_is_3p5() helper makes it easy to spot the > PMUv3p5 specific handling. > > Signed-off-by: Marc Zyngier <maz@xxxxxxxxxx> > --- > arch/arm64/kvm/pmu-emul.c | 8 +++++--- > arch/arm64/kvm/sys_regs.c | 4 ++++ > include/kvm/arm_pmu.h | 7 +++++++ > 3 files changed, 16 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/arch/arm64/kvm/pmu-emul.c b/arch/arm64/kvm/pmu-emul.c > index 4320c389fa7f..c37cc67ff1d7 100644 > --- a/arch/arm64/kvm/pmu-emul.c > +++ b/arch/arm64/kvm/pmu-emul.c > @@ -52,13 +52,15 @@ static u32 kvm_pmu_event_mask(struct kvm *kvm) > */ > static bool kvm_pmu_idx_is_64bit(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, u64 select_idx) > { > - return (select_idx == ARMV8_PMU_CYCLE_IDX); > + return (select_idx == ARMV8_PMU_CYCLE_IDX || kvm_pmu_is_3p5(vcpu)); > } > > static bool kvm_pmu_idx_has_64bit_overflow(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, u64 select_idx) > { > - return (select_idx == ARMV8_PMU_CYCLE_IDX && > - __vcpu_sys_reg(vcpu, PMCR_EL0) & ARMV8_PMU_PMCR_LC); > + u64 val = __vcpu_sys_reg(vcpu, PMCR_EL0); > + > + return (select_idx < ARMV8_PMU_CYCLE_IDX && (val & ARMV8_PMU_PMCR_LP)) || > + (select_idx == ARMV8_PMU_CYCLE_IDX && (val & ARMV8_PMU_PMCR_LC)); Since the vCPU's PMCR_EL0 value is not always in sync with kvm->arch.dfr0_pmuver.imp, shouldn't kvm_pmu_idx_has_64bit_overflow() check kvm_pmu_is_3p5() ? (e.g. when the host supports PMUv3p5, PMCR.LP will be set by reset_pmcr() initially. Then, even if userspace sets ID_AA64DFR0_EL1.PMUVER to PMUVer_V3P1, PMCR.LP will stay the same (still set) unless PMCR is written. So, kvm_pmu_idx_has_64bit_overflow() might return true even though the guest's PMU version is lower than PMUVer_V3P5.) > } > > static bool kvm_pmu_counter_can_chain(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, u64 idx) > diff --git a/arch/arm64/kvm/sys_regs.c b/arch/arm64/kvm/sys_regs.c > index dc201a0557c0..615cb148e22a 100644 > --- a/arch/arm64/kvm/sys_regs.c > +++ b/arch/arm64/kvm/sys_regs.c > @@ -654,6 +654,8 @@ static void reset_pmcr(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, const struct sys_reg_desc *r) > | (ARMV8_PMU_PMCR_MASK & 0xdecafbad)) & (~ARMV8_PMU_PMCR_E); > if (!kvm_supports_32bit_el0()) > val |= ARMV8_PMU_PMCR_LC; > + if (!kvm_pmu_is_3p5(vcpu)) > + val &= ~ARMV8_PMU_PMCR_LP; > __vcpu_sys_reg(vcpu, r->reg) = val; > } > > @@ -703,6 +705,8 @@ static bool access_pmcr(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, struct sys_reg_params *p, > val |= p->regval & ARMV8_PMU_PMCR_MASK; > if (!kvm_supports_32bit_el0()) > val |= ARMV8_PMU_PMCR_LC; > + if (!kvm_pmu_is_3p5(vcpu)) > + val &= ~ARMV8_PMU_PMCR_LP; > __vcpu_sys_reg(vcpu, PMCR_EL0) = val; > kvm_pmu_handle_pmcr(vcpu, val); > kvm_vcpu_pmu_restore_guest(vcpu); For the read case of access_pmcr() (the code below), since PMCR.LP is RES0 when FEAT_PMUv3p5 is not implemented, shouldn't it clear PMCR.LP if kvm_pmu_is_3p5(vcpu) is false ? (Similar issue to kvm_pmu_idx_has_64bit_overflow()) } else { /* PMCR.P & PMCR.C are RAZ */ val = __vcpu_sys_reg(vcpu, PMCR_EL0) & ~(ARMV8_PMU_PMCR_P | ARMV8_PMU_PMCR_C); p->regval = val; } Thank you, Reiji > diff --git a/include/kvm/arm_pmu.h b/include/kvm/arm_pmu.h > index 812f729c9108..628775334d5e 100644 > --- a/include/kvm/arm_pmu.h > +++ b/include/kvm/arm_pmu.h > @@ -89,6 +89,12 @@ void kvm_vcpu_pmu_restore_host(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu); > vcpu->arch.pmu.events = *kvm_get_pmu_events(); \ > } while (0) > > +/* > + * Evaluates as true when emulating PMUv3p5, and false otherwise. > + */ > +#define kvm_pmu_is_3p5(vcpu) \ > + (vcpu->kvm->arch.dfr0_pmuver.imp >= ID_AA64DFR0_EL1_PMUVer_V3P5) > + > u8 kvm_arm_pmu_get_pmuver_limit(void); > > #else > @@ -153,6 +159,7 @@ static inline u64 kvm_pmu_get_pmceid(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, bool pmceid1) > } > > #define kvm_vcpu_has_pmu(vcpu) ({ false; }) > +#define kvm_pmu_is_3p5(vcpu) ({ false; }) > static inline void kvm_pmu_update_vcpu_events(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu) {} > static inline void kvm_vcpu_pmu_restore_guest(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu) {} > static inline void kvm_vcpu_pmu_restore_host(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu) {} > -- > 2.34.1 > _______________________________________________ kvmarm mailing list kvmarm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://lists.cs.columbia.edu/mailman/listinfo/kvmarm