On Thu, 17 Nov 2022 00:23:48 +0000, Sean Christopherson <seanjc@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > Marc, > > I would like to route this through Paolo's tree/queue for 6.2 along with > a big pile of other selftests updates. I am hoping to get the selftests > pile queued sooner than later as there is a lot of active development in > that area, and don't want to have the selftests be in a broken state. > I'm going to send Paolo a pull request shortly, I'll Cc you (and others) > to keep everyone in the loop and give a chance for objections. > > > > Fix a typo and an imminenent not-technically-a-bug bug in the single-step > test where executing an atomic sequence in the guest with single-step > enable will hang the guest due to eret clearing the local exclusive > monitor. > > > Sean Christopherson (2): > KVM: arm64: selftests: Disable single-step with correct KVM define > KVM: arm64: selftests: Disable single-step without relying on ucall() I'm obviously late to the party, but hey... For the record: Acked-by: Marc Zyngier <maz@xxxxxxxxxx> M. -- Without deviation from the norm, progress is not possible. _______________________________________________ kvmarm mailing list kvmarm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://lists.cs.columbia.edu/mailman/listinfo/kvmarm
