Re: [kvm-unit-tests PATCH] MAINTAINERS: new kvmarm mailing list

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Fri, Oct 28 2022, Andrew Jones <andrew.jones@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:

> On Fri, Oct 28, 2022 at 01:37:34PM +0200, Cornelia Huck wrote:
>> On Tue, Oct 25 2022, Cornelia Huck <cohuck@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>> 
>> > KVM/arm64 development is moving to a new mailing list (see
>> > https://lore.kernel.org/all/20221001091245.3900668-1-maz@xxxxxxxxxx/);
>> > kvm-unit-tests should advertise the new list as well.
>> >
>> > Signed-off-by: Cornelia Huck <cohuck@xxxxxxxxxx>
>> > ---
>> >  MAINTAINERS | 3 ++-
>> >  1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>> >
>> > diff --git a/MAINTAINERS b/MAINTAINERS
>> > index 90ead214a75d..649de509a511 100644
>> > --- a/MAINTAINERS
>> > +++ b/MAINTAINERS
>> > @@ -67,7 +67,8 @@ ARM
>> >  M: Andrew Jones <andrew.jones@xxxxxxxxx>
>> >  S: Supported
>> >  L: kvm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>> > -L: kvmarm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>> > +L: kvmarm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>> > +L: kvmarm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx (deprecated)
>> 
>> As the days of the Columbia list really seem to be numbered (see
>> https://lore.kernel.org/all/364100e884023234e4ab9e525774d427@xxxxxxxxxx/),
>> should we maybe drop it completely from MAINTAINERS, depending on when
>> this gets merged?
>
> I'll merge your patch now with the old (deprecated) list still there. When
> mail starts bouncing it may help people better understand why. When the
> kernel drops it from its MAINTAINERS file, then we can drop it here too.

OK, makes sense.

_______________________________________________
kvmarm mailing list
kvmarm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://lists.cs.columbia.edu/mailman/listinfo/kvmarm



[Index of Archives]     [Linux KVM]     [Spice Development]     [Libvirt]     [Libvirt Users]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]

  Powered by Linux