Hi Eric,
On 10/12/22 20:33, Marc Zyngier wrote:
> Hi Eric,
>
> Before I comment on this patch, a couple of things that need
> addressing:
>
>> "Cc: marc.zyngier@xxxxxxx, cdall@xxxxxxxxxx"
>
> None of these two addresses are valid anymore, and haven't been for
> several years.
>
> Please consult the MAINTAINERS file for up-to-date addresses for
> current maintainers and reviewers, all of whom should be Cc'd on this
> email. I've now added them as well as Eric Auger who has written most
> of the ITS migration code, and the new mailing list (the Columbia list
> is about to be killed).
>
> On Wed, 12 Oct 2022 17:59:25 +0100,
> Eric Ren <renzhengeek@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>>
>> Reproducer hints:
>> 1. Create ARM virt VM with pxb-pcie bus which adds
>> extra host bridges, with qemu command like:
>>
>> ```
>> -device pxb-pcie,bus_nr=8,id=pci.x,numa_node=0,bus=pcie.0 \
>> -device pcie-root-port,..,bus=pci.x \
>> ...
>> -device pxb-pcie,bus_nr=37,id=pci.y,numa_node=1,bus=pcie.0 \
>> -device pcie-root-port,..,bus=pci.y \
>> ...
>>
>> ```
>> 2. Perform VM migration which calls save/restore device tables.
>>
>> In that setup, we get a big "offset" between 2 device_ids (
>> one is small, another is big), which makes unsigned "len" round
>> up a big positive number, causing loop to continue exceptionally.
>
> You'll have to spell it out for me here. If you have a very sparse
> device ID and you are only using a single level device table, you are
> bound to have a large len. Now, is the issue that 'size' is so large
> that it is negative as an 'int'? Describing the exact situation you're
> in would help a lot.
>
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Eric Ren <renzhengeek@xxxxxxxxx>
>> ---
>> arch/arm64/kvm/vgic/vgic-its.c | 2 +-
>> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/arch/arm64/kvm/vgic/vgic-its.c b/arch/arm64/kvm/vgic/vgic-its.c
>> index 24d7778d1ce6..673554ef02f9 100644
>> --- a/arch/arm64/kvm/vgic/vgic-its.c
>> +++ b/arch/arm64/kvm/vgic/vgic-its.c
>> @@ -2141,7 +2141,7 @@ static int scan_its_table(struct vgic_its *its, gpa_t base, int size, u32 esz,
>> int start_id, entry_fn_t fn, void *opaque)
>> {
>> struct kvm *kvm = its->dev->kvm;
>> - unsigned long len = size;
>> + ssize_t len = size;
>
> This feels wrong, really. If anything, all these types should be
> unsigned, not signed. Signed types in this context make very little
> sense...
After digging into the code back again, I realized I told you something
wrong. The next_offset is the delta between the current device id and
the next one. The next device can perfectly be in a different L1 device
table, - it is your case actually- , in which case the code is
definitely broken.
So I guess we should rather have a
while (true) {
../..
if (byte_offset >= len)
break;
len -= byte_offset;
}
You can add a Fixes tag too:
Fixes: 920a7a8fa92a ("KVM: arm64: vgic-its: Add infrastructure for table
lookup")
and cc stable@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Thanks
Eric
>
> Thanks,
>
> M.
>
_______________________________________________
kvmarm mailing list
kvmarm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://lists.cs.columbia.edu/mailman/listinfo/kvmarm
