Re: [PATCH v5 3/7] KVM: x86: Allow to use bitmap in ring-based dirty page tracking

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Hi Peter,

On 10/7/22 4:28 AM, Peter Xu wrote:
On Wed, Oct 05, 2022 at 08:41:50AM +0800, Gavin Shan wrote:
-8.29 KVM_CAP_DIRTY_LOG_RING/KVM_CAP_DIRTY_LOG_RING_ACQ_REL
-----------------------------------------------------------
+8.29 KVM_CAP_DIRTY_LOG_{RING, RING_ACQ_REL, RING_ALLOW_BITMAP}
+--------------------------------------------------------------

Shall we make it a standalone cap, just to rely on DIRTY_RING[_ACQ_REL]
being enabled first, instead of making the three caps at the same level?

E.g. we can skip creating bitmap for DIRTY_RING[_ACQ_REL] && !_ALLOW_BITMAP
(x86).


Both KVM_CAP_DIRTY_LOG_RING and KVM_CAP_DIRTY_LONG_RING_ACQ_REL are available
to x86. So KVM_CAP_DIRTY_LONG_RING_ACQ_REL can be enabled on x86 in theory.
However, the idea to disallow bitmap for KVM_CAP_DIRTY_LOG_RING (x86) makes
sense to me. I think you may be suggesting something like below.

- bool struct kvm::dirty_ring_allow_bitmap

- In kvm_vm_ioctl_enable_dirty_log_ring(), set 'dirty_ring_allow_bitmap' to
  true when the capability is KVM_CAP_DIRTY_LONG_RING_ACQ_REL

  static int kvm_vm_ioctl_enable_dirty_log_ring(struct kvm *kvm, u32 cap, u32 size)
  {
    :
    mutex_lock(&kvm->lock);

    if (kvm->created_vcpus) {
       /* We don't allow to change this value after vcpu created */
       r = -EINVAL;
    } else {
       kvm->dirty_ring_size = size;
       kvm->dirty_ring_allow_bitmap = (cap == KVM_CAP_DIRTY_LOG_RING_ACQ_REL);
       r = 0;
    }

    mutex_unlock(&kvm->lock);
    return r;
  }
- In kvm_vm_ioctl_check_extension_generic(), KVM_CAP_DIRTY_LOG_RING_ALLOW_BITMAP
  is always flase until KVM_CAP_DIRTY_LOG_RING_ACQ_REL is enabled.

  static long kvm_vm_ioctl_check_extension_generic(...)
  {
    :
    case KVM_CAP_DIRTY_LOG_RING_ALLOW_BITMAP:
        return kvm->dirty_ring_allow_bitmap ? 1 : 0;
  }

- The suggested dirty_ring_exclusive() is used.

@@ -2060,10 +2060,6 @@ int kvm_get_dirty_log(struct kvm *kvm, struct kvm_dirty_log *log,
  	unsigned long n;
  	unsigned long any = 0;
- /* Dirty ring tracking is exclusive to dirty log tracking */
-	if (kvm->dirty_ring_size)
-		return -ENXIO;

Then we can also have one dirty_ring_exclusive(), with something like:

bool dirty_ring_exclusive(struct kvm *kvm)
{
         return kvm->dirty_ring_size && !kvm->dirty_ring_allow_bitmap;
}

Does it make sense?  Thanks,


Thanks,
Gavin

_______________________________________________
kvmarm mailing list
kvmarm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://lists.cs.columbia.edu/mailman/listinfo/kvmarm



[Index of Archives]     [Linux KVM]     [Spice Development]     [Libvirt]     [Libvirt Users]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]

  Powered by Linux