Re: [PATCH v6 00/13] KVM: selftests: Add aarch64/page_fault_test

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Mon, Sep 19, 2022 at 05:57:16PM +0100, Marc Zyngier wrote:
> On Mon, 19 Sep 2022 17:38:14 +0100,
> Sean Christopherson <seanjc@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > 
> > On Mon, Sep 19, 2022, Marc Zyngier wrote:
> > > On Tue, 6 Sep 2022 18:09:17 +0000, Ricardo Koller wrote:
> > > > This series adds a new aarch64 selftest for testing stage 2 fault handling for
> > > > various combinations of guest accesses (e.g., write, S1PTW), backing sources
> > > > (e.g., anon), and types of faults (e.g., read on hugetlbfs with a hole, write
> > > > on a readonly memslot). Each test tries a different combination and then checks
> > > > that the access results in the right behavior (e.g., uffd faults with the right
> > > > address and write/read flag). Some interesting combinations are:
> > > > 
> > > > [...]
> > > 
> > > Given how long this has been around, I've picked this series up, applying
> > > Oliver's fixes in the process.
> > 
> > Any chance this can be undone?  A big reason why this is at v6 is
> > because of the common API changes, and due to KVM Forum I've
> > effectively had three working days since this was posted, and others
> > have probably had even less, i.e. lack of reviews on v6 isn't
> > because no one cares.
> 
> Hey, I'm still not back at work, and won't be for another week! But
> fair enough, if there is going to be a respin, I'd rather see that
> (and I'm less hung up on tests having been in -next for some time
> before sending out a PR that eventually reaches Linus).
> 
> > It's not the end of the world if we have to fix things up on top,
> > but we'd avoid a decent amount of churn if we can instead unwind and
> > do a v7.
> 
> No skin off my nose, as this leaves on its own topic branch. Now
> dropped.

Thank you both. Yes, this will make our lives easier (including getting
the changes internally).

Ricardo

> 
> 	M.
> 
> -- 
> Without deviation from the norm, progress is not possible.
_______________________________________________
kvmarm mailing list
kvmarm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://lists.cs.columbia.edu/mailman/listinfo/kvmarm



[Index of Archives]     [Linux KVM]     [Spice Development]     [Libvirt]     [Libvirt Users]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]

  Powered by Linux