Hi Drew,
On Mon, Sep 05, 2022 at 09:31:40AM +0200, Andrew Jones wrote:
[...]
> > +static uint64_t reg_ids[] = {
> > + KVM_ARM64_SYS_REG(SYS_ID_PFR0_EL1),
> > + KVM_ARM64_SYS_REG(SYS_ID_PFR1_EL1),
> > + KVM_ARM64_SYS_REG(SYS_ID_DFR0_EL1),
> > + KVM_ARM64_SYS_REG(SYS_ID_MMFR0_EL1),
> > + KVM_ARM64_SYS_REG(SYS_ID_MMFR1_EL1),
> > + KVM_ARM64_SYS_REG(SYS_ID_MMFR2_EL1),
> > + KVM_ARM64_SYS_REG(SYS_ID_MMFR3_EL1),
> > + KVM_ARM64_SYS_REG(SYS_ID_ISAR0_EL1),
> > + KVM_ARM64_SYS_REG(SYS_ID_ISAR1_EL1),
> > + KVM_ARM64_SYS_REG(SYS_ID_ISAR2_EL1),
> > + KVM_ARM64_SYS_REG(SYS_ID_ISAR3_EL1),
> > + KVM_ARM64_SYS_REG(SYS_ID_ISAR4_EL1),
> > + KVM_ARM64_SYS_REG(SYS_ID_ISAR5_EL1),
> > + KVM_ARM64_SYS_REG(SYS_ID_MMFR4_EL1),
> > + KVM_ARM64_SYS_REG(SYS_ID_ISAR6_EL1),
> > + KVM_ARM64_SYS_REG(SYS_MVFR0_EL1),
> > + KVM_ARM64_SYS_REG(SYS_MVFR1_EL1),
> > + KVM_ARM64_SYS_REG(SYS_MVFR2_EL1),
> > + KVM_ARM64_SYS_REG(SYS_ID_PFR2_EL1),
> > + KVM_ARM64_SYS_REG(SYS_ID_MMFR5_EL1),
>
> Hi Oliver,
>
> I see all the hidden and unallocated registers have been filtered out of
> the test lists. They should also behave as RAZ, right? Maybe we should
> keep them in the lists here for consistency and to test them as well.
Sure, can do. The reason I only tested these registers is because they
have RAZ/WI behavior with this series, whereas the rest are RAZ +
invariant. Should be easy enough to cover the whole range, though.
--
Thanks,
Oliver
_______________________________________________
kvmarm mailing list
kvmarm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://lists.cs.columbia.edu/mailman/listinfo/kvmarm
