Re: [PATCH 2/6] KVM: arm64: Remove internal accessor helpers for id regs

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Hi Oliver,

On Wed, Aug 17, 2022 at 2:48 PM Oliver Upton <oliver.upton@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> The internal accessors are only ever called once. Dump out their
> contents in the caller.
>
> No functional change intended.
>
> Signed-off-by: Oliver Upton <oliver.upton@xxxxxxxxx>
> ---
>  arch/arm64/kvm/sys_regs.c | 46 ++++++++++-----------------------------
>  1 file changed, 12 insertions(+), 34 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/arch/arm64/kvm/sys_regs.c b/arch/arm64/kvm/sys_regs.c
> index e18efb9211f0..26210f3a0b27 100644
> --- a/arch/arm64/kvm/sys_regs.c
> +++ b/arch/arm64/kvm/sys_regs.c
> @@ -1153,25 +1153,17 @@ static unsigned int raz_visibility(const struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu,
>
>  /* cpufeature ID register access trap handlers */
>
> -static bool __access_id_reg(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu,
> -                           struct sys_reg_params *p,
> -                           const struct sys_reg_desc *r,
> -                           bool raz)
> -{
> -       if (p->is_write)
> -               return write_to_read_only(vcpu, p, r);
> -
> -       p->regval = read_id_reg(vcpu, r, raz);
> -       return true;
> -}
> -
>  static bool access_id_reg(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu,
>                           struct sys_reg_params *p,
>                           const struct sys_reg_desc *r)
>  {
>         bool raz = sysreg_visible_as_raz(vcpu, r);
>
> -       return __access_id_reg(vcpu, p, r, raz);
> +       if (p->is_write)
> +               return write_to_read_only(vcpu, p, r);
> +
> +       p->regval = read_id_reg(vcpu, r, raz);
> +       return true;
>  }
>
>  /* Visibility overrides for SVE-specific control registers */
> @@ -1226,31 +1218,13 @@ static int set_id_aa64pfr0_el1(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu,
>   * are stored, and for set_id_reg() we don't allow the effective value
>   * to be changed.
>   */
> -static int __get_id_reg(const struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu,
> -                       const struct sys_reg_desc *rd, u64 *val,
> -                       bool raz)
> -{
> -       *val = read_id_reg(vcpu, rd, raz);
> -       return 0;
> -}
> -
> -static int __set_id_reg(const struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu,
> -                       const struct sys_reg_desc *rd, u64 val,
> -                       bool raz)
> -{
> -       /* This is what we mean by invariant: you can't change it. */
> -       if (val != read_id_reg(vcpu, rd, raz))
> -               return -EINVAL;
> -
> -       return 0;
> -}
> -
>  static int get_id_reg(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, const struct sys_reg_desc *rd,
>                       u64 *val)
>  {
>         bool raz = sysreg_visible_as_raz(vcpu, rd);
>
> -       return __get_id_reg(vcpu, rd, val, raz);
> +       *val = read_id_reg(vcpu, rd, raz);
> +       return 0;
>  }
>
>  static int set_id_reg(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, const struct sys_reg_desc *rd,
> @@ -1258,7 +1232,11 @@ static int set_id_reg(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, const struct sys_reg_desc *rd,
>  {
>         bool raz = sysreg_visible_as_raz(vcpu, rd);
>
> -       return __set_id_reg(vcpu, rd, val, raz);
> +       /* This is what we mean by invariant: you can't change it. */
> +       if (val != read_id_reg(vcpu, rd, raz))
> +               return -EINVAL;
> +
> +       return 0;
>  }

I see no reason for read_id_reg() to take raz as an argument.
Perhaps having read_id_reg() call sysreg_visible_as_raz() instead
might make those functions even simpler?

Thank you,
Reiji
_______________________________________________
kvmarm mailing list
kvmarm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://lists.cs.columbia.edu/mailman/listinfo/kvmarm



[Index of Archives]     [Linux KVM]     [Spice Development]     [Libvirt]     [Libvirt Users]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]

  Powered by Linux