Hi Marc,
On Fri, Aug 05, 2022 at 02:58:12PM +0100, Marc Zyngier wrote:
> PMUv3p5 (which is mandatory with ARMv8.5) comes with some extra
> features:
>
> - All counters are 64bit
>
> - The overflow point is controlled by the PMCR_EL0.LP bit
>
> Add the required checks in the helpers that control counter
> width and overflow, as well as the sysreg handling for the LP
> bit. A new kvm_pmu_is_3p5() helper makes it easy to spot the
> PMUv3p5 specific handling.
>
> Signed-off-by: Marc Zyngier <maz@xxxxxxxxxx>
> ---
> arch/arm64/kvm/pmu-emul.c | 8 +++++---
> arch/arm64/kvm/sys_regs.c | 4 ++++
> include/kvm/arm_pmu.h | 8 ++++++++
> 3 files changed, 17 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/arch/arm64/kvm/pmu-emul.c b/arch/arm64/kvm/pmu-emul.c
> index 33a88ca7b7fd..b33a2953cbf6 100644
> --- a/arch/arm64/kvm/pmu-emul.c
> +++ b/arch/arm64/kvm/pmu-emul.c
> @@ -50,13 +50,15 @@ static u32 kvm_pmu_event_mask(struct kvm *kvm)
> */
> static bool kvm_pmu_idx_is_64bit(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, u64 select_idx)
> {
> - return (select_idx == ARMV8_PMU_CYCLE_IDX);
> + return (select_idx == ARMV8_PMU_CYCLE_IDX || kvm_pmu_is_3p5(vcpu));
> }
>
> static bool kvm_pmu_idx_has_64bit_overflow(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, u64 select_idx)
> {
> - return (select_idx == ARMV8_PMU_CYCLE_IDX &&
> - __vcpu_sys_reg(vcpu, PMCR_EL0) & ARMV8_PMU_PMCR_LC);
> + u64 val = __vcpu_sys_reg(vcpu, PMCR_EL0);
> +
> + return (select_idx < ARMV8_PMU_CYCLE_IDX && (val & ARMV8_PMU_PMCR_LP)) ||
> + (select_idx == ARMV8_PMU_CYCLE_IDX && (val & ARMV8_PMU_PMCR_LC));
> }
>
> static bool kvm_pmu_counter_can_chain(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, u64 idx)
> diff --git a/arch/arm64/kvm/sys_regs.c b/arch/arm64/kvm/sys_regs.c
> index c0595f31dab8..2b5e0ec5c100 100644
> --- a/arch/arm64/kvm/sys_regs.c
> +++ b/arch/arm64/kvm/sys_regs.c
> @@ -654,6 +654,8 @@ static void reset_pmcr(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, const struct sys_reg_desc *r)
> | (ARMV8_PMU_PMCR_MASK & 0xdecafbad)) & (~ARMV8_PMU_PMCR_E);
> if (!system_supports_32bit_el0())
> val |= ARMV8_PMU_PMCR_LC;
> + if (!kvm_pmu_is_3p5(vcpu))
> + val &= ~ARMV8_PMU_PMCR_LP;
> __vcpu_sys_reg(vcpu, r->reg) = val;
> }
>
> @@ -703,6 +705,8 @@ static bool access_pmcr(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, struct sys_reg_params *p,
> val |= p->regval & ARMV8_PMU_PMCR_MASK;
> if (!system_supports_32bit_el0())
> val |= ARMV8_PMU_PMCR_LC;
> + if (!kvm_pmu_is_3p5(vcpu))
> + val &= ~ARMV8_PMU_PMCR_LP;
> __vcpu_sys_reg(vcpu, PMCR_EL0) = val;
> kvm_pmu_handle_pmcr(vcpu, val);
> kvm_vcpu_pmu_restore_guest(vcpu);
> diff --git a/include/kvm/arm_pmu.h b/include/kvm/arm_pmu.h
> index 6bda9b071084..846502251923 100644
> --- a/include/kvm/arm_pmu.h
> +++ b/include/kvm/arm_pmu.h
> @@ -89,6 +89,13 @@ void kvm_vcpu_pmu_restore_host(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu);
> vcpu->arch.pmu.events = *kvm_get_pmu_events(); \
> } while (0)
>
> +/*
> + * Evaluates as true when emulating PMUv3p5, and false otherwise.
> + */
> +#define kvm_pmu_is_3p5(vcpu) \
> + (vcpu->kvm->arch.dfr0_pmuver >= ID_AA64DFR0_PMUVER_8_5 && \
> + vcpu->kvm->arch.dfr0_pmuver != ID_AA64DFR0_PMUVER_IMP_DEF)
I don't believe the IMP_DEF condition will ever evaluate to false as
dfr0_pmuver is sanitized at initialization and writes from userspace.
> u8 kvm_arm_pmu_get_host_pmuver(void);
>
> #else
> @@ -153,6 +160,7 @@ static inline u64 kvm_pmu_get_pmceid(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, bool pmceid1)
> }
>
> #define kvm_vcpu_has_pmu(vcpu) ({ false; })
> +#define kvm_pmu_is_3p5(vcpu) ({ false; })
> static inline void kvm_pmu_update_vcpu_events(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu) {}
> static inline void kvm_vcpu_pmu_restore_guest(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu) {}
> static inline void kvm_vcpu_pmu_restore_host(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu) {}
> --
> 2.34.1
>
_______________________________________________
kvmarm mailing list
kvmarm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://lists.cs.columbia.edu/mailman/listinfo/kvmarm
