On Tue, Aug 09, 2022, Gavin Shan wrote: > On 8/9/22 5:17 PM, Florian Weimer wrote: > > * Florian Weimer: > > > > > * Gavin Shan: > > > > > > > sched_getcpu() is glibc dependent and it can simply return the CPU > > > > ID from the registered rseq information, as Florian Weimer pointed. > > > > In this case, it's pointless to compare the return value from > > > > sched_getcpu() and that fetched from the registered rseq information. > > > > > > > > Fix the issue by replacing sched_getcpu() with getcpu(), as Florian > > > > suggested. The comments are modified accordingly. > > > > > > Note that getcpu was added in glibc 2.29, so perhaps you need to perform > > > a direct system call? > > > > One more thing: syscall(__NR_getcpu) also has the advantage that it > > wouldn't have to be changed again if node IDs become available via rseq > > and getcpu is implemented using that. > > > > Thanks, > > Florian > > > > Thanks, Florian. It makes sense to me to use syscall(__NR_getcpu) in > next revision. Thanks for your quick review :) +1, and definitely add a comment to prevent future "cleanup". _______________________________________________ kvmarm mailing list kvmarm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://lists.cs.columbia.edu/mailman/listinfo/kvmarm
