On Sun, Jul 24, 2022 at 10:40:20AM +0100, Marc Zyngier wrote: > On Sat, 23 Jul 2022 08:59:55 +0100, > Andrew Jones <andrew.jones@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > > > On Fri, Jul 22, 2022 at 02:53:20PM -0700, Ricardo Koller wrote: > > > > > > Which brings me to what to do with this test. Should it be fixed for > > > bare-metal by ignoring the PMOVSSET check? or should it actually check > > > for PMOVSSET=1 and fail on KVM until KVM gets fixed? > > > > > > > Hi Ricardo, > > > > Please write the test per the spec. Failures pointed out in kvm-unit-tests > > are great, when the tests are written correctly, since it means it's > > doing its job :-) > > Agreed. This is a bug, and bugs are to be fixed. The fact that it will > flare up and annoy people is a good incentive to fix the kernel! > Sounds good, thank you both. Will send V2 with the proper behavior then. Thanks, Ricardo > Thanks, > > M. > > -- > Without deviation from the norm, progress is not possible. _______________________________________________ kvmarm mailing list kvmarm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://lists.cs.columbia.edu/mailman/listinfo/kvmarm
