On Tue, 19 Jul 2022 20:35:46 +0100, Mark Brown <broonie@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > On Tue, Jul 19, 2022 at 06:35:37PM +0100, Catalin Marinas wrote: > > IIRC both Will and Mark R commented in the past that they'd like the > > current de-facto ABI to become the official one. I'll let them comment. > > That would be good. I've not heard anything from Will either directly > or indirectly. Mark R has indicated privately directly to me that he > originally pushed for the currently implemented behaviour and prefers > it. Marc Zyngier has previously noted publicly the current behaviour > being a consideration in the context of discusion of optimisation ideas > like this one, I was a bit surprised that he commented on an earlier > patch in the series but not this one. Just because I don't repeat myself doesn't mean I changed my mind. I still don't buy the ABI change, as there is already a large(-ish) body of SW that assumes the current semantics. M. -- Without deviation from the norm, progress is not possible. _______________________________________________ kvmarm mailing list kvmarm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://lists.cs.columbia.edu/mailman/listinfo/kvmarm
