On Tue, Jul 19, 2022 at 10:08:30AM +0800, Gavin Shan wrote:
> In rseq_test, there are two threads, which are vCPU thread and migration
> worker separately. Unfortunately, the test has the wrong PID passed to
> sched_setaffinity() in the migration worker. It forces migration on the
> migration worker because zeroed PID represents the calling thread, which
> is the migration worker itself. It means the vCPU thread is never enforced
> to migration and it can migrate at any time, which eventually leads to
> failure as the following logs show.
>
> host# uname -r
> 5.19.0-rc6-gavin+
> host# # cat /proc/cpuinfo | grep processor | tail -n 1
> processor : 223
> host# pwd
> /home/gavin/sandbox/linux.main/tools/testing/selftests/kvm
> host# for i in `seq 1 100`; do \
> echo "--------> $i"; ./rseq_test; done
> --------> 1
> --------> 2
> --------> 3
> --------> 4
> --------> 5
> --------> 6
> ==== Test Assertion Failure ====
> rseq_test.c:265: rseq_cpu == cpu
> pid=3925 tid=3925 errno=4 - Interrupted system call
> 1 0x0000000000401963: main at rseq_test.c:265 (discriminator 2)
> 2 0x0000ffffb044affb: ?? ??:0
> 3 0x0000ffffb044b0c7: ?? ??:0
> 4 0x0000000000401a6f: _start at ??:?
> rseq CPU = 4, sched CPU = 27
>
> Fix the issue by passing correct parameter, TID of the vCPU thread, to
> sched_setaffinity() in the migration worker.
>
> Fixes: 61e52f1630f5 ("KVM: selftests: Add a test for KVM_RUN+rseq to detect task migration bugs")
> Suggested-by: Sean Christopherson <seanjc@xxxxxxxxxx>
> Signed-off-by: Gavin Shan <gshan@xxxxxxxxxx>
> Reviewed-by: Oliver Upton <oliver.upton@xxxxxxxxx>
> ---
> v4: Pick the code change as Sean suggested.
> ---
> tools/testing/selftests/kvm/rseq_test.c | 8 +++++---
> 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/rseq_test.c b/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/rseq_test.c
> index 4158da0da2bb..2237d1aac801 100644
> --- a/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/rseq_test.c
> +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/rseq_test.c
> @@ -82,8 +82,9 @@ static int next_cpu(int cpu)
> return cpu;
> }
>
> -static void *migration_worker(void *ign)
> +static void *migration_worker(void *__rseq_tid)
> {
> + pid_t rseq_tid = (pid_t)(unsigned long)__rseq_tid;
> cpu_set_t allowed_mask;
> int r, i, cpu;
>
> @@ -106,7 +107,7 @@ static void *migration_worker(void *ign)
> * stable, i.e. while changing affinity is in-progress.
> */
> smp_wmb();
> - r = sched_setaffinity(0, sizeof(allowed_mask), &allowed_mask);
> + r = sched_setaffinity(rseq_tid, sizeof(allowed_mask), &allowed_mask);
> TEST_ASSERT(!r, "sched_setaffinity failed, errno = %d (%s)",
> errno, strerror(errno));
> smp_wmb();
> @@ -231,7 +232,8 @@ int main(int argc, char *argv[])
> vm = vm_create_default(VCPU_ID, 0, guest_code);
> ucall_init(vm, NULL);
>
> - pthread_create(&migration_thread, NULL, migration_worker, 0);
> + pthread_create(&migration_thread, NULL, migration_worker,
> + (void *)(unsigned long)gettid());
>
> for (i = 0; !done; i++) {
> vcpu_run(vm, VCPU_ID);
> --
> 2.23.0
Thanks for figuring this out Gavin and Sean!
Reviewed-by: Andrew Jones <andrew.jones@xxxxxxxxx>
_______________________________________________
kvmarm mailing list
kvmarm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://lists.cs.columbia.edu/mailman/listinfo/kvmarm
