On Mon, Jul 18, 2022 at 05:42:08PM +0100, Alexandru Elisei wrote: > Hi, > > I believe you're missing the updated email for the arm maintainer. Added it. > > Thanks, > Alex > > On Mon, Jul 18, 2022 at 08:49:07AM -0700, Ricardo Koller wrote: > > There are some tests that fail when running on bare metal (including a > > passthrough prototype). There are three issues with the tests. The > > first one is that there are some missing isb()'s between enabling event > > counting and the actual counting. This wasn't an issue on KVM as > > trapping on registers served as context synchronization events. The > > second issue is that some tests assume that registers reset to 0. And > > finally, the third issue is that overflowing the low counter of a > > chained event sets the overflow flag in PMVOS and some tests fail by > > checking for it not being set. > > > > I believe the third fix also requires a KVM change, but would like to > > double check with others first. The only reference I could find in the > > ARM ARM is the AArch64.IncrementEventCounter() pseudocode (DDI 0487H.a, > > J1.1.1 "aarch64/debug") that unconditionally sets the PMOVS bit on > > overflow. > > > > Ricardo Koller (3): > > arm: pmu: Add missing isb()'s after sys register writing > > arm: pmu: Reset the pmu registers before starting some tests > > arm: pmu: Remove checks for !overflow in chained counters tests > > > > arm/pmu.c | 34 +++++++++++++++++++++++----------- > > 1 file changed, 23 insertions(+), 11 deletions(-) > > > > -- > > 2.37.0.170.g444d1eabd0-goog > > Right, I forgot about the new email. Thanks for the forwarding! _______________________________________________ kvmarm mailing list kvmarm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://lists.cs.columbia.edu/mailman/listinfo/kvmarm
