On Mon, Jul 18, 2022 at 08:26:14AM -0700, Kalesh Singh wrote: > On Mon, Jul 18, 2022 at 5:52 AM Russell King (Oracle) > <linux@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > > > Hi, > > > > Can you please explain why you are targetting my @oracle.com email > > address with this patch set? > > > > This causes me problems as I use Outlook's Web interface for that > > which doesn't appear to cope with the threading, and most certainly > > is only capable of top-reply only which is against Linux kernel email > > standards. > > Hi Russell, > > Sorry I wasn't aware of it (I got your oracle email from > get_maintainer script). Going forward I'll use the one you responded > from instead. Oh, this is the very annoying behaviour of get_maintainer.pl default mode to think that if someone touches a file, they're interested in future changes to it. In this case, it's because we both touched arch/arm64/include/asm/memory.h back in November 2021, and this silly script thinks I'll still be interested. b89ddf4cca43 arm64/bpf: Remove 128MB limit for BPF JIT programs (The patch was originally developed for Oracle's UEK kernels, hence why it's got my @oracle.com address, but was later merged upstream. Interestingly, no one spotted that Alan Maguire's s-o-b should've been on it, as he was involved in the submission path to mainline.) -- RMK's Patch system: https://www.armlinux.org.uk/developer/patches/ FTTP is here! 40Mbps down 10Mbps up. Decent connectivity at last! _______________________________________________ kvmarm mailing list kvmarm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://lists.cs.columbia.edu/mailman/listinfo/kvmarm
