On Fri, 15 Jul 2022 07:10:20 +0100,
Kalesh Singh <kaleshsingh@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> Add stub implementations of non-protected nVHE stack unwinder, for
> building. These are implemented later in this series.
>
> Signed-off-by: Kalesh Singh <kaleshsingh@xxxxxxxxxx>
> ---
> arch/arm64/include/asm/stacktrace/nvhe.h | 22 ++++++++++++++++++++++
> 1 file changed, 22 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/arch/arm64/include/asm/stacktrace/nvhe.h b/arch/arm64/include/asm/stacktrace/nvhe.h
> index 1eac4e57f2ae..36cf7858ddd8 100644
> --- a/arch/arm64/include/asm/stacktrace/nvhe.h
> +++ b/arch/arm64/include/asm/stacktrace/nvhe.h
> @@ -8,6 +8,12 @@
> * the HYP memory. The stack is unwinded in EL2 and dumped to a shared
> * buffer where the host can read and print the stacktrace.
> *
> + * 2) Non-protected nVHE mode - the host can directly access the
> + * HYP stack pages and unwind the HYP stack in EL1. This saves having
> + * to allocate shared buffers for the host to read the unwinded
> + * stacktrace.
> + *
> + *
> * Copyright (C) 2022 Google LLC
> */
> #ifndef __ASM_STACKTRACE_NVHE_H
> @@ -53,5 +59,21 @@ static int notrace unwind_next(struct unwind_state *state)
> NOKPROBE_SYMBOL(unwind_next);
> #endif /* CONFIG_PROTECTED_NVHE_STACKTRACE */
>
> +/*
> + * Non-protected nVHE HYP stack unwinder
> + */
> +#else /* !__KVM_NVHE_HYPERVISOR__ */
I don't get this path. This either represents the VHE hypervisor or
the kernel proper. Which one is it?
> +static inline bool on_overflow_stack(unsigned long sp, unsigned long size,
> + struct stack_info *info)
> +{
> + return false;
> +}
> +
> +static int notrace unwind_next(struct unwind_state *state)
> +{
> + return 0;
> +}
> +NOKPROBE_SYMBOL(unwind_next);
> +
> #endif /* __KVM_NVHE_HYPERVISOR__ */
> #endif /* __ASM_STACKTRACE_NVHE_H */
Thanks,
M.
--
Without deviation from the norm, progress is not possible.
_______________________________________________
kvmarm mailing list
kvmarm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://lists.cs.columbia.edu/mailman/listinfo/kvmarm
