On Tue, 5 Jul 2022 14:23:10 +0000, Quentin Perret wrote: > Although harmless, the return statement in kvm_unexpected_el2_exception > is rather confusing as the function itself has a void return type. The > C standard is also pretty clear that "A return statement with an > expression shall not appear in a function whose return type is void". > Given that this return statement does not seem to add any actual value, > let's not pointlessly violate the standard. > > [...] Applied to kvm-arm64/misc-5.20, thanks! [1/1] KVM: arm64: Don't return from void function commit: 1c3ace2b8b3995d3213c5e2d2aca01a0577a3b0f Cheers, M. -- Marc Zyngier <maz@xxxxxxxxxx> _______________________________________________ kvmarm mailing list kvmarm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://lists.cs.columbia.edu/mailman/listinfo/kvmarm