On Mon, 02 May 2022 08:24:28 +0100,
Oliver Upton <oupton@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> Hi Yosry,
>
> On Fri, Apr 29, 2022 at 08:11:31PM +0000, Yosry Ahmed wrote:
> > Count the pages used by KVM in arm64 for stage2 mmu in secondary pagetable
> > stats.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Yosry Ahmed <yosryahmed@xxxxxxxxxx>
> > ---
> > arch/arm64/kvm/mmu.c | 35 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++----
> > 1 file changed, 31 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/arch/arm64/kvm/mmu.c b/arch/arm64/kvm/mmu.c
> > index 53ae2c0640bc..fc5030307cce 100644
> > --- a/arch/arm64/kvm/mmu.c
> > +++ b/arch/arm64/kvm/mmu.c
> > @@ -92,9 +92,13 @@ static bool kvm_is_device_pfn(unsigned long pfn)
> > static void *stage2_memcache_zalloc_page(void *arg)
> > {
> > struct kvm_mmu_memory_cache *mc = arg;
> > + void *virt;
> >
> > /* Allocated with __GFP_ZERO, so no need to zero */
> > - return kvm_mmu_memory_cache_alloc(mc);
> > + virt = kvm_mmu_memory_cache_alloc(mc);
> > + if (virt)
> > + kvm_account_pgtable_pages(virt, +1);
>
> Sorry I didn't say it last time around, would now be a good time to
> clean up the funky sign convention of kvm_mod_used_mmu_pages()? Or limit
> the funk to just x86 :)
Indeed. I pointed this out in my initial review of this series, and
expected these to be gone by now.
M.
--
Without deviation from the norm, progress is not possible.
_______________________________________________
kvmarm mailing list
kvmarm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://lists.cs.columbia.edu/mailman/listinfo/kvmarm
