Hi Reiji,
Sorry for the late reply.
On Wed, Apr 13, 2022 at 10:26 PM Reiji Watanabe <reijiw@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
[...]
> > @@ -457,7 +459,7 @@ int kvm_arch_vcpu_ioctl_set_mpstate(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu,
> >
> > switch (mp_state->mp_state) {
> > case KVM_MP_STATE_RUNNABLE:
> > - vcpu->arch.power_off = false;
> > + vcpu->arch.mp_state = *mp_state;
>
> Nit: It might be a bit odd that KVM_MP_STATE_STOPPED case only copies
> the 'mp_state' field of kvm_mp_state from userspace (that's not a 'copy'
> operation though), while KVM_MP_STATE_RUNNABLE case copies entire
> kvm_mp_state from user space.
> ('mp_state' is the only field of kvm_mp_state though)
I tried my best to leave this all as-is. I hinted at it in another
thread, but I really do think a refactoring would be good to make ARM
actually use the mp_state value instead of relying on vCPU requests. I
completely agree with the nit, but think it might be better to
collapse all of the weirdness around mp_state in a separate
patch/series which will drag the vCPU run loop along.
> Reviewed-by: Reiji Watanabe <reijiw@xxxxxxxxxx>
Much appreciated :)
--
Best,
Oliver
_______________________________________________
kvmarm mailing list
kvmarm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://lists.cs.columbia.edu/mailman/listinfo/kvmarm
