On Wed, Apr 13, 2022 at 2:22 AM Gavin Shan <gshan@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> Hi Raghavendra,
>
> On 4/7/22 9:16 AM, Raghavendra Rao Ananta wrote:
> > Add the register KVM_REG_ARM_FW_REG(3)
> > (KVM_REG_ARM_SMCCC_ARCH_WORKAROUND_3) to the base_regs[] of
> > get-reg-list.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Raghavendra Rao Ananta <rananta@xxxxxxxxxx>
> > ---
> > tools/testing/selftests/kvm/aarch64/get-reg-list.c | 1 +
> > 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)
> >
> > diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/aarch64/get-reg-list.c b/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/aarch64/get-reg-list.c
> > index 281c08b3fdd2..7049c31aa443 100644
> > --- a/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/aarch64/get-reg-list.c
> > +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/aarch64/get-reg-list.c
> > @@ -691,6 +691,7 @@ static __u64 base_regs[] = {
> > KVM_REG_ARM_FW_REG(0),
> > KVM_REG_ARM_FW_REG(1),
> > KVM_REG_ARM_FW_REG(2),
> > + KVM_REG_ARM_FW_REG(3),
> > KVM_REG_ARM_FW_FEAT_BMAP_REG(0), /* KVM_REG_ARM_STD_BMAP */
> > KVM_REG_ARM_FW_FEAT_BMAP_REG(1), /* KVM_REG_ARM_STD_HYP_BMAP */
> > KVM_REG_ARM_FW_FEAT_BMAP_REG(2), /* KVM_REG_ARM_VENDOR_HYP_BMAP */
> >
>
> It seems the same fixup has been done in another patch.
>
> https://www.mail-archive.com/kvmarm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx/msg38027.html
>
Yes, Andrew won the race :(
I'll drop this patch.
> Thanks,
> Gavin
>
Regards,
Raghavendra
_______________________________________________
kvmarm mailing list
kvmarm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://lists.cs.columbia.edu/mailman/listinfo/kvmarm
