Re: [kvm-unit-tests PATCH] libfdt: use logical "or" instead of bitwise "or" with boolean operands

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Tue, Mar 15, 2022 at 11:02:14PM -0700, Bill Wendling wrote:
> Clang warns about using a bitwise '|' with boolean operands. This seems
> to be due to a small typo.
> 
>   lib/libfdt/fdt_rw.c:438:6: warning: use of bitwise '|' with boolean operands [-Werror,-Wbitwise-instead-of-logical]
>           if (can_assume(LIBFDT_ORDER) |
> 
> Using '||' removes this warnings.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Bill Wendling <morbo@xxxxxxxxxx>
> ---
>  lib/libfdt/fdt_rw.c | 2 +-
>  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
> 
> diff --git a/lib/libfdt/fdt_rw.c b/lib/libfdt/fdt_rw.c
> index 13854253ff86..3320e5559cac 100644
> --- a/lib/libfdt/fdt_rw.c
> +++ b/lib/libfdt/fdt_rw.c
> @@ -435,7 +435,7 @@ int fdt_open_into(const void *fdt, void *buf, int bufsize)
>  			return struct_size;
>  	}
>  
> -	if (can_assume(LIBFDT_ORDER) |
> +	if (can_assume(LIBFDT_ORDER) ||
>  	    !fdt_blocks_misordered_(fdt, mem_rsv_size, struct_size)) {
>  		/* no further work necessary */
>  		err = fdt_move(fdt, buf, bufsize);
> -- 
> 2.35.1.723.g4982287a31-goog
>

We're not getting as much interest in the submodule discussion as I hoped.
I see one vote against on this thread and one vote for on a different
thread[1]. For now I'll just commit a big rebase patch for libfdt. We can
revisit it again after we decide what to do for QCBOR.

Thanks,
drew

[1] https://lore.kernel.org/kvm/20220316105109.oi5g532ylijzldte@gator/T/#m48c47c761f3b3a4da636482b6385c59d4a990137 

_______________________________________________
kvmarm mailing list
kvmarm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://lists.cs.columbia.edu/mailman/listinfo/kvmarm



[Index of Archives]     [Linux KVM]     [Spice Development]     [Libvirt]     [Libvirt Users]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]

  Powered by Linux