Re: [PATCH v3 1/8] KVM: arm64: Introduce hyp_alloc_private_va_range()

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Thu, Feb 24, 2022 at 4:25 AM Fuad Tabba <tabba@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> Hi Kalesh,
>
> On Thu, Feb 24, 2022 at 5:16 AM Kalesh Singh <kaleshsingh@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> >
> > hyp_alloc_private_va_range() can be used to reserve private VA ranges
> > in the nVHE hypervisor. Also update  __create_hyp_private_mapping()
> > to allow specifying an alignment for the private VA mapping.
> >
> > These will be used to implement stack guard pages for KVM nVHE hypervisor
> > (nVHE Hyp mode / not pKVM), in a subsequent patch in the series.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Kalesh Singh <kaleshsingh@xxxxxxxxxx>
> > ---
> >
> > Changes in v3:
> >   - Handle null ptr in IS_ERR_OR_NULL checks, per Mark
> >
> >  arch/arm64/include/asm/kvm_mmu.h |  4 +++
> >  arch/arm64/kvm/mmu.c             | 62 ++++++++++++++++++++------------
> >  2 files changed, 43 insertions(+), 23 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/arch/arm64/include/asm/kvm_mmu.h b/arch/arm64/include/asm/kvm_mmu.h
> > index 81839e9a8a24..0b0c71302b92 100644
> > --- a/arch/arm64/include/asm/kvm_mmu.h
> > +++ b/arch/arm64/include/asm/kvm_mmu.h
> > @@ -153,6 +153,10 @@ static __always_inline unsigned long __kern_hyp_va(unsigned long v)
> >  int kvm_share_hyp(void *from, void *to);
> >  void kvm_unshare_hyp(void *from, void *to);
> >  int create_hyp_mappings(void *from, void *to, enum kvm_pgtable_prot prot);
> > +unsigned long hyp_alloc_private_va_range(size_t size, size_t align);
> > +int __create_hyp_private_mapping(phys_addr_t phys_addr, size_t size,
> > +                               size_t align, unsigned long *haddr,
> > +                               enum kvm_pgtable_prot prot);
> >  int create_hyp_io_mappings(phys_addr_t phys_addr, size_t size,
> >                            void __iomem **kaddr,
> >                            void __iomem **haddr);
> > diff --git a/arch/arm64/kvm/mmu.c b/arch/arm64/kvm/mmu.c
> > index bc2aba953299..fc09536c8197 100644
> > --- a/arch/arm64/kvm/mmu.c
> > +++ b/arch/arm64/kvm/mmu.c
> > @@ -457,22 +457,16 @@ int create_hyp_mappings(void *from, void *to, enum kvm_pgtable_prot prot)
> >         return 0;
> >  }
> >
> > -static int __create_hyp_private_mapping(phys_addr_t phys_addr, size_t size,
> > -                                       unsigned long *haddr,
> > -                                       enum kvm_pgtable_prot prot)
> > +
> > +/*
> > + * Allocates a private VA range below io_map_base.
> > + *
> > + * @size:      The size of the VA range to reserve.
> > + * @align:     The required alignment for the allocation.
> > + */
>
> Many of the functions in this file use the kernel-doc format, and your
> added comments are close, but not quite conforment. If you want to use
> the kernel-doc for these you can refer to:
> https://www.kernel.org/doc/html/latest/doc-guide/kernel-doc.html

Hi Fuad,

Thanks for the pointer. I will update the function comments to match
when I send the next version.

>
> > +unsigned long hyp_alloc_private_va_range(size_t size, size_t align)
> >  {
> >         unsigned long base;
> > -       int ret = 0;
> > -
> > -       if (!kvm_host_owns_hyp_mappings()) {
> > -               base = kvm_call_hyp_nvhe(__pkvm_create_private_mapping,
> > -                                        phys_addr, size, prot);
> > -               if (IS_ERR_OR_NULL((void *)base))
> > -                       return PTR_ERR((void *)base);
> > -               *haddr = base;
> > -
> > -               return 0;
> > -       }
> >
> >         mutex_lock(&kvm_hyp_pgd_mutex);
> >
> > @@ -484,8 +478,8 @@ static int __create_hyp_private_mapping(phys_addr_t phys_addr, size_t size,
> >          *
> >          * The allocated size is always a multiple of PAGE_SIZE.
> >          */
> > -       size = PAGE_ALIGN(size + offset_in_page(phys_addr));
> > -       base = io_map_base - size;
> > +       base = io_map_base - PAGE_ALIGN(size);
> > +       base = ALIGN_DOWN(base, align);
> >
> >         /*
> >          * Verify that BIT(VA_BITS - 1) hasn't been flipped by
> > @@ -493,20 +487,42 @@ static int __create_hyp_private_mapping(phys_addr_t phys_addr, size_t size,
> >          * overflowed the idmap/IO address range.
> >          */
> >         if ((base ^ io_map_base) & BIT(VA_BITS - 1))
> > -               ret = -ENOMEM;
> > +               base = (unsigned long)ERR_PTR(-ENOMEM);
> >         else
> >                 io_map_base = base;
> >
> >         mutex_unlock(&kvm_hyp_pgd_mutex);
> >
> > -       if (ret)
> > -               goto out;
> > +       return base;
> > +}
> > +
> > +int __create_hyp_private_mapping(phys_addr_t phys_addr, size_t size,
> > +                               size_t align, unsigned long *haddr,
> > +                               enum kvm_pgtable_prot prot)
> > +{
> > +       unsigned long addr;
> > +       int ret = 0;
> > +
> > +       if (!kvm_host_owns_hyp_mappings()) {
> > +               addr = kvm_call_hyp_nvhe(__pkvm_create_private_mapping,
> > +                                        phys_addr, size, prot);
> > +               if (IS_ERR_OR_NULL((void *)addr))
> > +                       return addr ? PTR_ERR((void *)addr) : -ENOMEM;
> > +               *haddr = addr;
> > +
> > +               return 0;
> > +       }
> > +
> > +       size += offset_in_page(phys_addr);
>
> You're not page-aligning the size, which was the behavior before this
> patch. However, looking at where it's being used it seems to be fine
> because the users of size would align it if necessary.

This is now done by hyp_alloc_private_va_range() when calculating the new base:
 ...
 * The allocated size is always a multiple of PAGE_SIZE.
 */
base = io_map_base - PAGE_ALIGN(size);
...

Thanks,
Kalesh

>
> Thanks,
> /fuad
>
>
>
> > +       addr = hyp_alloc_private_va_range(size, align);
> > +       if (IS_ERR_OR_NULL((void *)addr))
> > +               return addr ? PTR_ERR((void *)addr) : -ENOMEM;
> >
> > -       ret = __create_hyp_mappings(base, size, phys_addr, prot);
> > +       ret = __create_hyp_mappings(addr, size, phys_addr, prot);
> >         if (ret)
> >                 goto out;
> >
> > -       *haddr = base + offset_in_page(phys_addr);
> > +       *haddr = addr + offset_in_page(phys_addr);
> >  out:
> >         return ret;
> >  }
> > @@ -537,7 +553,7 @@ int create_hyp_io_mappings(phys_addr_t phys_addr, size_t size,
> >                 return 0;
> >         }
> >
> > -       ret = __create_hyp_private_mapping(phys_addr, size,
> > +       ret = __create_hyp_private_mapping(phys_addr, size, PAGE_SIZE,
> >                                            &addr, PAGE_HYP_DEVICE);
> >         if (ret) {
> >                 iounmap(*kaddr);
> > @@ -564,7 +580,7 @@ int create_hyp_exec_mappings(phys_addr_t phys_addr, size_t size,
> >
> >         BUG_ON(is_kernel_in_hyp_mode());
> >
> > -       ret = __create_hyp_private_mapping(phys_addr, size,
> > +       ret = __create_hyp_private_mapping(phys_addr, size, PAGE_SIZE,
> >                                            &addr, PAGE_HYP_EXEC);
> >         if (ret) {
> >                 *haddr = NULL;
> > --
> > 2.35.1.473.g83b2b277ed-goog
> >
_______________________________________________
kvmarm mailing list
kvmarm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://lists.cs.columbia.edu/mailman/listinfo/kvmarm



[Index of Archives]     [Linux KVM]     [Spice Development]     [Libvirt]     [Libvirt Users]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]

  Powered by Linux