On Wed, 23 Feb 2022 04:18:35 +0000,
Oliver Upton <oupton@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> diff --git a/include/linux/kvm_host.h b/include/linux/kvm_host.h
> index f11039944c08..9085a1b1569a 100644
> --- a/include/linux/kvm_host.h
> +++ b/include/linux/kvm_host.h
> @@ -2202,6 +2202,13 @@ static inline void kvm_handle_signal_exit(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
> }
> #endif /* CONFIG_KVM_XFER_TO_GUEST_WORK */
>
> +static inline void kvm_vcpu_set_system_event_exit(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, u32 type)
> +{
> + memset(&vcpu->run->system_event, 0, sizeof(vcpu->run->system_event));
> + vcpu->run->system_event.type = type;
> + vcpu->run->exit_reason = KVM_EXIT_SYSTEM_EVENT;
> +}
> +
nit: does this really deserve an inline function? I'd stick that in
kvm_main.c, really. Or is that getting in the way of building KVM as a
module on 'the other architecture'?
M.
--
Without deviation from the norm, progress is not possible.
_______________________________________________
kvmarm mailing list
kvmarm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://lists.cs.columbia.edu/mailman/listinfo/kvmarm
